AA5B POH PDF
NOTE: The original AA1 POH is not legal to use due to later revisions. The Gulfstream American version is the latest and the LEGAL one to use. Original. MODEL AA5B TIGER. TABLE OF CONTENTS airplane was delivered, it was equipped with a Pilot’s Operating Handbook, engine operator’s manual, weight. AA1 POH · AA1A POH · AA1B POH · AA1B WITH DMA AUX FUEL POH · AA1C POH · AA5 POH · AA5A Cheetah POH · AA5B Tiger ( – ) POH.
|Published (Last):||11 June 2004|
|PDF File Size:||3.78 Mb|
|ePub File Size:||5.82 Mb|
|Price:||Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]|
Dave TheisenJun 23, They are graphic, so that intermediate values are available without the need to use that now cheap electronic calculator for interpolation.
Shorter takeoff and landing distances, faster airspeeds, etc. PilawtJun 23, Yes, my oph is: Feb 23, Messages: One which was sold as representing 75 and 76 models although it is not dated is in MPH.
Grumman Pilot Operating Handbooks
Jun 27, Messages: No, create an account now. Posted fuel burn for the Cheetah is different at ‘ DA than for higher altitudes. Do you already have an account? Sep 26, Messages: Byington’s article states that the calibrated airspeed  for maximum specific range is independent of altitude. I found a 77 online but I also saw some info that speeds and such may be different between a 75 and It’s a simple task to divide one number by the other, so the charts include graphs for specific range miles per gallon.
They are derived directly from POH data. So the manuals have performance listed in tables that help the pilot avoid having to calculate density altitude. Can’t imagine why the POH numbers would differ from ’75 to ‘ Sep 19, Messages: ChemGuyJun 23, One parameter that is not usually addressed is best range. Guys, I am trying to get checked out in a ’75 AA5B this aab.
Jan 1, Messages: You’d better get the right numbers, your instructor is a hard ass. Dowagiac, MI Display Name: Anyone know where a POH is online so i can review procedures and speeds?
AA5B Tiger – Online POH
Marietta, GA Display Name: Northern New Mexico Display Name: These charts were compiled from data for the series only. It wouldn’t be much of a graph. Log in or Sign up. Mar 5, Messages: For lighter weights, performance is better in all parameters. AA5 Traveler Cruise Performance.
POH | Grumman Pilots Association
There is no difference in airplane performance. Landing Distance Short field: I have two versions of the AA5B handbook.
The charts here are based on density altitude which is easy to calculate these days. The tables from the manual were simply entered into a spreadsheet and plotted.
Once this number is known, the pilot can easily get the required indicated airspeed, and fly that speed at any altitude to maximize his range. I have contacted a few “experts” about the discrepancy, but nobody has come up with an explanation for it.
Grumman Airplane Performance Charts
Rogers makes the same point a5ab his excellent series on technical flying. Your name or email address: Data are given for the airplane at maximum gross weight. You must log in or sign up to reply here. Melville Byington and Russ Erb wrote articles on this topic over twenty years ago, and David Rogers more recently, but ax5b results still don’t seem to be widely used. At Grumman speeds, this is the same as calibrated airspeed.
Otherwise I don’t know of any reason for performance numbers of Tigers built during the ’70s being different from one another. The information was always there, just cloaked a little bit. I agree with Pilawt. Data for the ‘s and ‘s should not be substantially different.