EWR 127-1 PDF

Title: EWR 21AUG95, Version: , Date: Aug, Status: Active, Desc: EWR EASTERN AND WESTERN RANGE (EWR). Tailored EWR , System Safety Program Plan, Noncompliance Requests, and Launch Complex Safety Training and Certification. Find the most up-to-date version of EWR CONT. DIST. at Engineering

Author: Zutilar Dukora
Country: Zimbabwe
Language: English (Spanish)
Genre: Love
Published (Last): 6 June 2017
Pages: 104
PDF File Size: 18.12 Mb
ePub File Size: 6.99 Mb
ISBN: 865-1-60662-168-8
Downloads: 90791
Price: Free* [*Free Regsitration Required]
Uploader: Goltibar

To manage the safety aspects of the acquisition-like functions specified in the memorandum of agreement, AFMC should establish 1271- independent safety office. Navy and Air Force, and aircraft flight tests.

Modeling and Analysis Issues. This section discusses several key issues affecting public safety during launch. Page 20 Share Cite. Page 14 Share Cite. Hazardous material storage Hong Kong. In addition to a transfer of safety system functions, the committee concluded that responsibilities for developing detailed safety models to support flight operations should also be transferred.

Therefore, the absence of FTS capability beyond the coverage area of uprange assets would not reduce safety for malfunctions that terminate thrust prematurely. AFSPC should define objective, consistent risk standards e. A key element of current range safety eqr involves defining the thresholds used during launch to determine when a flight should be terminated.

To account for delays in operator response, uncertainties about vehicle breakup, winds, and other aerodynamic effects, destruct lines are 127- inside of the Ewg.

Cutting off fuel helps prevent the vehicle from veering off course and minimizes the size of the debris pattern by keeping the vehicle largely intact until it breaks up at lower altitudes.

Orbital vehicles are tracked and FTS commands are issued only to the horizon i. Air Force Space Command. Because of inherent uncertainties in input parameters and modeling assumptions, safety assessments can provide only approximate results, even though range safety personnel are constantly improving their analytical models based on actual range experience.

Destruct lines and flight termination system requirements should be defined and implemented in a way that is directly traceable to accepted risk standards.


Ready to take your reading offline? Maintaining, staffing, and operating downrange facilities and providing reliable, real-time communications between the downrange facilities and the Range Operations Control Center ROCC at the ER is expensive. Memo for the Record. In the course of its study of the risk criteria used at the WR and ER, the committee reviewed a number of documents. These functions include developmental testing and 12-71, sustaining engineering, and certifying that system designs meet safety requirements.

Petrochemicals Santa Barbara County. DoD Department of Defense. In support of the acquisition process, AFSPC is responsible for defining and prioritizing operational requirements for existing and new launch vehicles and systems and for communicating those requirements to AFMC. The effect of this conservatism is that actual operations are likely to be safer than predicted.

EWR is issued under the authority of the 30th and 45th wing commanders. Primary Recommendation on EWR Wwr azimuths are constrained during the uprange portion of flight to avoid overflight of inhabited landmasses during the boost phase.

The 217-1 of design, qualification, and acceptance testing processes, as well as lessons learned, should be incorporated in the new documentation and removed from EWR Probability of Failure per second. The range safety staff must, of course, be very knowledgeable about the content of the models and how to use them during prelaunch and launch operations.

Range safety user manual EWR 127-1 (Eastern and Western Range 127-1)

It may also be feasible to move other gates uprange and further reduce the need for downrange fwr. For example, the ranges use dwr assumptions and models in computing safety metrics, such as E cand they use analytical results differently. As a result, EWR is a huge document that is focused much more on methods and solutions than on basic, performance-based safety requirements. Findings and Recommendations on Roles and Responsibilities. Single Manager Roles and Responsibilities.


The basic responsibility of the newly established AFMC safety office would be to support to the system program offices and AFSPC, as appropriate during the acquisition, developmental testing, sustainment, and improvement of space systems.

See Chapter 5 for a discussion of limits on individual hit probabilities, P ifor ships and aircraft. Based on feedback from you, our users, we’ve made some improvements that make it easier than ever to read thousands of publications on our website.

AFMC is responsible for development, qualification, and acceptance tests of new or modified systems to show that systems comply with all specifications and requirements provided by the operational organization at the component, subsystem, and system levels.

Range safety user manual EWR (Eastern and Western Range ) [PDF] – Все для студента

Commercial nuclear power plants United States. The location of the Africa gate typically corresponds to the position of the IIP at approximately to seconds after launch see Figure Obtaining final Range Safety approval to launch can be a tedious and difficult objective to achieve; however, with an understanding of the process, proper planning, and proper engineering, you can accomplish this goal in a manner that is consistent with mission objectives with little or no impact to your program budget or schedule.

From throughU. Application of Risk Management. In addition, inconsistencies in the tailoring process may mean that different users incur different costs to certify the same equipment depending, in part, on the negotiating skills and expertise of the engineers working with range safety personnel.

These inconsistencies are examined in light of the risk posed by vehicles as they approach orbit to show that downrange safety-related assets can be eliminated while safety is maintained within accepted limits.